[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 107: Rework of IPv6 assignment criteria
owen at delong.com
Sat Jan 16 21:26:59 EST 2010
How about this:
220.127.116.11 Initial Assignments to Community Networks
Organizations may receive an initial assignment for operating a Community Network after documenting that they meet the criteria specified in section 2.11.
On Jan 16, 2010, at 6:13 PM, David Farmer wrote:
> Michael Richardson wrote:
>>>>>>> "David" == David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> writes:
>> Member> 18.104.22.168 Criteria for initial assignment to Community
>> Member> Networks Organizations may justify an initial assignment for
>> Member> operating a Community Network only for the purpose of
>> Member> providing free or low-cost internet connectivity to the
>> Member> residents of their local service area. By documenting the
>> Member> service area they intend to serve, certifying that the
>> Member> community network staff is 100% volunteers, and otherwise
>> Member> meeting the definition of a Community Network.
>> >> Why does it matter how the staff is paid? We argued a lot about
>> >> this before. Did we wind up with a definition?
>> David> 2008-3 Community Networks was just added to the NRPM, two
>> David> days ago, and that requirement is in the definition.
>> Good, I wasn't sure if it happened.
>> David> 2.11. Community Network
>> David> A community network is any network organized and operated by
>> David> a volunteer group operating as or under the fiscal support of
>> David> a nonprofit organization or university for the purpose of
>> David> providing free or low-cost connectivity to the residents of
>> David> their local service area. To be treated as a community
>> David> network under ARIN policy, the applicant must certify to ARIN
>> David> that the community network staff is 100% volunteers.
>> If the definition is already there, then you do not need to repeat it.
> Yes, I had quickly added that part to the proposal after realizing 2008-3 had finally been added to the NRPM and that part didn't go through the same amount of refinement as the rest of the proposal. I am thinking about replacing that part with the following text.
> 22.214.171.124 Criteria for initial assignment to Community Networks
> Organizations may justify an initial assignment for operating a Community Network only for the purpose of providing free or low-cost Internet connectivity to the residents of their local service area.
> By documenting the service area they intend to serve and certifying that the network meets all the requirements of the definition of a Community Network from section 2.11.
> Is that better?
> Should the current section 6.10 Micro Allocation be integrated into this section as separate criteria? Micro Allocation have little technical difference from assignments. Or, should we just leave them as a separate section.
> This one is on a bit of a fast-track to get it ready for the up coming Toronto meeting.
> David Farmer Email:farmer at umn.edu
> Networking & Telecommunication Services
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota
> 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML