[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 107: Rework of IPv6 assignment criteria

Michael Richardson mcr at sandelman.ca
Sat Jan 16 19:44:19 EST 2010

>>>>> "David" == David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> writes:
    Member> Criteria for initial assignment to Community
    Member> Networks Organizations may justify an initial assignment for
    Member> operating a Community Network only for the purpose of
    Member> providing free or low-cost internet connectivity to the
    Member> residents of their local service area.  By documenting the
    Member> service area they intend to serve, certifying that the
    Member> community network staff is 100% volunteers, and otherwise
    Member> meeting the definition of a Community Network.

    >> Why does it matter how the staff is paid?  We argued a lot about
    >> this before.  Did we wind up with a definition?

    David> 2008-3 Community Networks was just added to the NRPM, two
    David> days ago, and that requirement is in the definition.

  Good, I wasn't sure if it happened.
    David> 2.11. Community Network

    David> A community network is any network organized and operated by
    David> a volunteer group operating as or under the fiscal support of
    David> a nonprofit organization or university for the purpose of
    David> providing free or low-cost connectivity to the residents of
    David> their local service area. To be treated as a community
    David> network under ARIN policy, the applicant must certify to ARIN
    David> that the community network staff is 100% volunteers.

  If the definition is already there, then you do not need to repeat it.

]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition. 

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list