[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 107: Rework of IPv6 assignment criteria
owen at delong.com
Fri Jan 15 15:03:04 EST 2010
On Jan 15, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>>>>> "Member" == Member Services <info at arin.net> writes:
> Member> Rationale:
> Member> This proposal provides a complete rework of the IPv6
> Member> end-user assignment criteria, removing the dependency on
> Member> IPv4 policy, while maintaining many of the basic concepts
> Member> contained in the current policies. The order of the
> So why does it grandfather IPv4 users, and maintain the notion that
> everyone should use RFC1918/"10-net" addressing, which in IPv6 appears
> to be ULA.
> The clauses:
> a. Having a previously justified IPv4 end-users assignment from ARIN or
> one of its predecessor registries, or;
> make no sense.
This is necessary to assure that those with IPv4 addresses are not prevented
from obtaining IPv6 resources. Otherwise, policy may serve as a further
barrier to IPv6 adoption by existing IPv4 users.
More information about the ARIN-PPML