[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 107: Rework of IPv6 assignment criteria

Michael Richardson mcr at sandelman.ca
Fri Jan 15 14:54:38 EST 2010

>>>>> "Member" == Member Services <info at arin.net> writes:
    Member> Rationale:

    Member> This proposal provides a complete rework of the IPv6
    Member> end-user assignment criteria, removing the dependency on
    Member> IPv4 policy, while maintaining many of the basic concepts
    Member> contained in the current policies.  The order of the

  So why does it grandfather IPv4 users, and maintain the notion that
everyone should use RFC1918/"10-net" addressing, which in IPv6 appears
to be ULA.

  The clauses:
        a. Having a previously justified IPv4 end-users assignment from ARIN or
        one of its predecessor registries, or;

  make no sense.

]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition. 

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list