[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2010-1: Waiting List for Unmet IPv4 Requests
Scott Leibrand
scottleibrand at gmail.com
Wed Jan 27 18:06:13 EST 2010
On 1/27/2010 2:32 PM, George Bonser wrote:
>
> Which brought to mind something that is related. I have not been on
> this list very long. Has there been discussion of some mechanism for
> recovery of issued but unused resources? By this I mean address blocks
> that are no longer in use because the company involved no longer exists
> or blocks that have never been put into service. A check of ipv4 PI
> blocks that have been issued but not advertized on the Internet for more
> than a year might be a place to start.
>
> I say this because I recently realized that a company I once worked for
> which had gone out of business still had a block of addresses and an ASN
> assigned to them so I contacted ARIN in order that the resources could
> be recovered for reuse. But I can't help but wonder how large a pool
> exists of allocated but unused resources.
>
Yes, existing policy does allow ARIN to reclaim/recover/revoke
non-legacy address space for various reasons, including non-payment of
fees, an organization going out of business (and not transferring the
assets justifying the addresses to an acquiring organization), or a
determination that the address space is no longer justified under
current policies.
One particular policy of interest is NRPM section 12:
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#twelve
Legacy space (space allocated before the creation of ARIN, and not under
RSA) is an entirely different can of worms.
-Scott
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list