[arin-ppml] V6 address allocation policy
farmer at umn.edu
Tue Jan 19 17:02:47 EST 2010
George Bonser wrote:
>>> I suppose they can only go by their current policy guidelines and
>>> apparently it is policy to allocate only what is needed for the
>>> immediate foreseeable future.
>> The current policy is justified need. I think that is a stricter
>> than is necessary, but, I don't know if that matters. Will we see you
>> at the Toronto meeting?
> Huh? http://www.nanog.org/meetings/future/index.php
> When is Toronto? I will be lucky to make it to San Francisco and that
> is just up the road a piece.
This is not NANOG, it is ARIN, ARIN and NANOG do hold joint meeting is
the fall, so maybe that confused you. See the following;
The next ARIN meeting is April 18-21 in Toronto, if you can't make the
meeting, I suggest you try remote participation. I can't find the link
for it right now, but it will be available when more of the details for
the meeting get announced in a month or so.
>> I hope you will participate and express your
>> support for whatever changes you think are needed to IPv6 policy.
> I like prop106 from an end user's perspective. It certainly makes
> things simple. What is hard to gauge is address requirements having
> been living in the NAT world for so long and address conservation having
> been a major constraint on design. It is going to take a while to break
> out of that kind of thinking.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
David Farmer Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
More information about the ARIN-PPML