[arin-ppml] V6 address allocation policy

[Davis, Terry L]

Martin

We are fine.  6 or 7 years back we got ours.

For small companies, start ups, or lab use, even fees of this scale is often a make or break.  We grew our IP infrastructure out of our labs.  It would have taken off much slower here if a few of us couldn't have simply emailed in to request public IPv4 class C's for our lab environments; it would have been hard to justify paying for addresses back then.

Take care
Terry
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Hannigan [mailto:marty at akamai.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 2:37 PM
> To: Davis, Terry L
> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] V6 address allocation policy
> 
> 
> On Jan 15, 2010, at 4:33 PM, Davis, Terry L wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> [ snip ]
> 
> > If I represented an IT or comm vendor right now, I'd be doing  
> > everything I could to get IPv6 used, including completely re- 
> > thinking or totally opening up the allocation policies and 
> reducing  
> > the costs to near zero, just to protect my investments.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Interesting. Here is the fee schedule, Terry:
> 
> 	X-small $1,250 /48 to /41
> 	Small $2,250 /40 to /32
> 	Medium $4,500 /31 to /30
> 	Large $9,000 /29 to /27
> 	X-large $18,000 /26 to /22
> 	XX-large $36,000 Larger than /22
> 
> Which one is too expensive for your actual needs?
> 
> 
> -M<
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>