[arin-ppml] V6 address allocation policy
mcr at sandelman.ca
Sat Jan 16 20:27:36 EST 2010
>>>>> "Owen" == Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> writes:
Terry> But yet even with the globe rushing headlong toward the end
Terry> of IPv4 space, probably within 24 months, v6 is still barely
Terry> crawling forward in deployments. It's not going into
Terry> greenfields, startups, etc.
>> If techies need to get their managers to approve a checque to ARIN,
>> the manager tells them to use IPv4 + NAT. If the techies do not have to
>> ask, then they will deploy IPv6 for internal use.
>> (ULA buys you nothing compared to net-10)
Owen> 1. ULA buys you a great deal more than RFC-1918. ULA is
Owen> if not globally unique.
Tell me what it gets me.
Tell me how, when two organizations merge, ULA saves them anything?
Owen> 2. You can get IPv6 space from many sources other than
Owen> writing a check to ARIN. For example, you can get a /48 with
Owen> tunneled service from several tunnel brokers.
Yes, that's what I currently advise people who need some address
space. The tunnel brockers also give me reverse DNS and sometimes whois.
Is that really what ARIN wants?
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
More information about the ARIN-PPML