[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 107: Rework of IPv6 assignment criteria
Michael Richardson
mcr at sandelman.ca
Fri Jan 15 14:54:38 EST 2010
>>>>> "Member" == Member Services <info at arin.net> writes:
Member> Rationale:
Member> This proposal provides a complete rework of the IPv6
Member> end-user assignment criteria, removing the dependency on
Member> IPv4 policy, while maintaining many of the basic concepts
Member> contained in the current policies. The order of the
So why does it grandfather IPv4 users, and maintain the notion that
everyone should use RFC1918/"10-net" addressing, which in IPv6 appears
to be ULA.
The clauses:
a. Having a previously justified IPv4 end-users assignment from ARIN or
one of its predecessor registries, or;
make no sense.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list