[arin-ppml] IPv6 Non-connected networks
packetgrrl at gmail.com
Mon Feb 8 00:00:09 EST 2010
In my experience with 220.127.116.11/14 none of these were cited.
The other problems we had were software that simply wasn't configured to
understand pieces of classically classful blocks. Most of the software
supported this it just had to be turned on.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr at sandelman.ca> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Let me put it a different way.
> When registrants that were allocated 69/8 or 18.104.22.168/11 were trying to
> negotiate with ISPs to remove bogon filters, did those ISPs ever respond
> with a statement like:
> "according to RFCxyz, these addresses should never be routed"?
> Was there any policy of the IETF, IANA, ICANN or ARIN that was cited as
> a reason why these addresses should not be routed?
> - --
> ] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! |
> firewalls [
> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net
> ] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device
> Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
> then sign the petition.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Finger me for keys
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML