[arin-ppml] RIPE/ITU

[Scott Leibrand]

Keep in mind that the English-speaking Caribbean is served by ARIN  
rather than LACNIC.

Scott

On Feb 26, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Skeeve Stevens <Skeeve at eintellego.net>  
wrote:

> Re the Caribbean, is it being suggested that LACNIC is not doing its  
> job for that region?
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> --
> Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director
> eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
> skeeve at eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net
> Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
> www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve ; facebook.com/eintellego
> --
> NOC, NOC, who's there?
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml- 
>> bounces at arin.net] On
>> Behalf Of michael.dillon at bt.com
>> Sent: Saturday, 27 February 2010 4:10 AM
>> To: arin-ppml at arin.net
>> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] RIPE/ITU
>>
>>
>>> Although I am indeed thankful to the ITU for keeping us poor
>>> and under privileged developing countries well stocked in
>>> IPv6 numbers, I would much prefer that ARIN consider
>>> structural modifications to allow for sub regional registries
>>> under present structure
>>
>> You might want to look into APNIC's NIR model which is exactly
>> that, and then make a formal proposal. I wouldn't expect you
>> to simply copy APNIC, but in making a proposal, I think you
>> should understand the alternatives. Also, I believe RIPE has
>> done something similar for the Russia and the ex-USSR countries,
>> partly because of the economic gap and partly because of legal
>> restrictions on signing contracts with foreign organizations.
>>
>> This is a good idea, and as a side effect, if you get all
>> the Caribbean networking people talking around the same
>> table on a regular basis, you will be able to react faster
>> and in a more coordinated fashion when disaster strikes.
>> Like the next hurricane, and the one after that...
>>
>> I don't see any connection between what you are suggesting
>> and the ITU's activities, and it is probably best if ARIN
>> considers your sub-registry proposal on its own merits.
>>
>> --Michael Dillon
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.