[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 109: Standardize IP ReassignmentRegistration Requirements

[Joe Morgan]

Ted Mittelstaedt

> In the future perhaps it might occur to certain people that if they
> don't have time to read and understand certain policy proposal changes
> that they lack the knowledge to make good policy decisions on them, and
> should just say nothing and let the folks who do understand a
> particular proposal to comment on it.

I feel he was making a point as much as anyone else has. Its probably
best we stay on topic instead of using this as your way of attacking
people. I personally have to agree with his point of what, if any,
kind of problem
does it attempt to solve.


On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at ipinc.net> wrote:
> Chris Grundemann wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 06:12,  <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Policy Proposal 109: Standardize IP Reassignment Registration
>>>> Requirements
>>>
>>> Huh!?
>>>
>>>>  - Add:
>>>>  - Rename 4.2.3.7. "Reassignment information" to "Registration"
>>>>
>>>>  - Rename 4.2.3.7.1. "Customer organization information" to
>>>> "Reassignment Information" and replace text with:
>>>>  - Replace 4.2.3.7.6. Residential Customer Privacy with:
>>>>  - Strike section 4.2.6. "Cable Address Space Policy"
>>>>  - Replace Section 6.5.5. with:
>>>
>>> I'm still not sure what this policy proposal is trying to do
>>> or what is being changed. Clearly, the only way to figure
>>> this out is to compare the existing copious verbiage in the NRPM
>>> with the copious verbiage in this policy and I haven't time
>>> to do this right now.
>>
>> Yes, reading the NRPM may be a prerequisite to understanding proposed
>> changes to it.
>>
>>> I am opposed to this proposal on the grounds of its complexity
>>> and the lack of clarity around what, if any, kind of problem
>>> it attempts to solve.
>>
>
> I was going to remain neutral on this policy proposal.  on one
> hand I like standardized disclosure.  On the other hand I do not
> like removing the onus to register anyone, even a residential
> user, in WHOIS.
>
> However after seeing Dillon's comment I am going to come out
> SOLIDLY IN FAVOR of this policy proposal if for no other reason
> than to counteract his no vote.
>
> In the future perhaps it might occur to certain people that if they
> don't have time to read and understand certain policy proposal changes
> that they lack the knowledge to make good policy decisions on them, and
> should just say nothing and let the folks who do understand a
> particular proposal to comment on it.
>
>
>
> Ted
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>



-- 
Thank You,
Joe Morgan
Joe's Datacenter, LLC
http://joesdatacenter.com