[arin-ppml] Draft policy 2010-3

Rudolph Daniel rudi.daniel at gmail.com
Tue Feb 2 15:22:17 EST 2010


Does the strictly confidence mean, no arbitrary free public access? if so
then there would have to be some procedure for access to the information.
Correct me if I am mistaken but I dont think ARIN is in the network trouble
shooting business. But it should have as much information as possible on its
assignments.
RD

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:12 PM, George Bonser <gbonser at seven.com> wrote:

>  And does “strictest confidence” mean nobody can access it?  If so, does
> ARIN want to troubleshoot problems concerning those “strictly confidential”
> networks out there? Or at least place itself in the middle of such
> troubleshooting or injecting itself in the middle of disputes concerning
> nefarious network activity?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] *On
> Behalf Of *Rudolph Daniel
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 02, 2010 11:36 AM
> *To:* arin-ppml at arin.net
> *Subject:* [arin-ppml] Draft policy 2010-3
>
>
>
>  "The customer's actual information must be provided to ARIN on requestand will be held in the strictest confidence."
>
>
>
> The wording of 2010-3:  I think that the "on request" should be a mandatory
> requirement. ARIN should not have to request it.
>
>
>
> RD
>



-- 
Rudi Daniel
e Business Consultant
http://www.svgpso.org
http://oecstimes.wordpress.com
“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.” - Bertrand
Russell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20100202/a17782fd/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list