[arin-ppml] *Spam?* Re: Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack

[Kevin Kargel]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
> Behalf Of Frank Bulk
> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 3:36 PM
> To: 'Jason Schiller'
> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: *Spam?* Re: [arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125
> Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
> 
> Jason:
> 
> Owen made some compelling arguments that have given me food for thought.
> 
> That said, at this time the petition would:
> a) need to adjust the definition of "real deployment for IPv6" to
> accommodate for content, eyeball, and any other kind of network.  While
> the
> devil is in the details, I currently can't think of any requestor that
> could
> say they would never need IPv6 anywhere in their network.  If getting IPv4
> space is important, they'll find some way to make IPv6 happen in their
> network.  If they can't justify it, then they'll make other accomodations.

What about the networks for whom in the near future at least IPv6 is unobtainable?  Are you just going to throw them to the wolves because they are geographically in the third world portion of the United States?