[arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack

[Bret Palsson]

On Dec 30, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Chris Grundemann wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:48, Bret Palsson <bret at getjive.com> wrote:
>> What is the exact intention of prop 125?
>> 
>> People keep saying what the intention is not. What is the plain english goal of prop 125?
> 
> As stated in the rational, this proposal has three objectives:
> 
> To encourage IPv6 deployment prior to and post depletion,
I think this is already taken care of. No more IPv4? Better use IPv6. That seems to be motive enough.
> to enable growth of IPv4 to accelerate IPv6 transition and
How does this enable the growth of IPv4 exactly? By freeing up space when people move to IPv6? See above comment. It will happen naturally.
> to improve the utilization of IP addresses.
I don't see how this "improves the utilization of IP addresses". 

Do we really need policy for something that will happen naturally?

> 
> Also see the full rational here:
> http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2010-December/018939.html
> And my recent elaboration here:
> http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2010-December/019108.html
> 
> HTH,
> Chris
> 
>> 
>> -Bret
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> @ChrisGrundemann
> weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
> www.burningwiththebush.com
> www.theIPv6experts.com
> www.coisoc.org