[arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
frnkblk at iname.com
Wed Dec 29 09:14:27 EST 2010
A second round of communication could only be beneficial. I'm not sure it
has to be targeted to the CxO level -- if it's sent to the tech, a nameless
version written for CxO's could be included, for the tech to forward
internally to the appropriate CxO.
From: Robert E. Seastrom [mailto:rs at seastrom.com] On Behalf Of Robert E.
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 6:12 AM
To: Dan White
Cc: Frank Bulk - iName.com; arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient
Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
Dan White <dwhite at olp.net> writes:
> It certainly helps to have good technical information to present to
> management - and the letter ARIN send out a while back was a great move. I
> still think that an organization is going to be better off by making
> grounded decisions in reality - and of course I'd like to think the tech
> folks have their ears closest to the tracks - than by ARIN telling
> organizations, via their tech folks, that they have to do it.
Since you found the original letter helpful, what would be your
thoughts on an additional round of letters on the occasion of free
pool runout? The costs are not trivial if they are sent to people at
the corporate officer level not people in the database as org or
resource contacts (in the former case there is a need to verify, via
D&B or whoever, that you're sending to the right folks)... but would
this be worthwhile?
More information about the ARIN-PPML