[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 125: Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
frnkblk at iname.com
Sat Dec 4 16:43:48 EST 2010
I understand your concerns, but why should requestor have an unencumbered
right to the last crumbs of IPv4 if they haven't made an effort to build out
some level of IPv4? Rather than seeing it as punishment for those who
haven't deployed IPv6, one could see it as a reward for those who have been
hard at work. And if others want to share in that "goldmine", they can if
they put out some effort.
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of William Herrin
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 10:00 AM
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 125: Efficient Utilization of IPv4
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
> Policy Proposal 125: Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
Too much at once. Way too big a step from current policy. Start small:
efficient IPv4 utilization justified by BGP-routed allocations
requires that you have received and routed an IPv6 allocation. You
don't have to have done anything more with it. Yet.
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML