[arin-ppml] Emergency PDP process

[Hannigan, Martin]

John,

My motivation, besides wanting the Internet to be able to successfully
transition to IPv6, is that I think that AC members should be seen more than
they should be heard with respect to policy writing and intend to follow
that doctrine. Hence, 122, 123 and 124 now. I also consider them to require
urgency since they deal with specific issues related to IANA exhaustion and
ARIN depletion. Nothing surprising here.

If 12/16 is good enough for you, it's good enough for me. I never made a
suggestion that you should do anything other than insure that these get air
time prior to IANA exhaustion and implementation of policy that was, in
Internet time, written a long while ago. As you noted, things changes on a
bi-monthly basis. So do opinions.


Best,

-M<



On 12/3/10 4:39 PM, "Sweeting, John" <john.sweeting at twcable.com> wrote:

> Marty,
> 
> I think your viewpoints will change considerably over the next few months,
> once you have the opportunity to be involved in the AC portion of the policy
> process. Looking forward to having you as part of the team.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/3/10 4:35 PM, "Hannigan, Martin" <marty at akamai.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> John,
> 
> If we use the same method of gauging consensus that we use for others, one
> would be able to say that there's consensus for everything in the queue.
> 
> Best,
> 
> -M<
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/3/10 4:34 PM, "Sweeting, John" <john.sweeting at twcable.com> wrote:
> 
>> And there was community consensus for that policy IMHO. Thanks.
>> 
>> ++
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/3/10 4:32 PM, "John Sweeting" <john.sweeting at twcable.com> wrote:
>> 
>> There is no uncertainty, the policy is what it is.
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/3/10 4:28 PM, "Hannigan, Martin" <marty at akamai.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/3/10 4:26 PM, "Bill Darte" <BillD at cait.wustl.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> [ clip ]
>> 
>>> 
>>> Personally thought, I think that at IANA run out, there will be time to
>>> consider all these measures and proposals.  John Curran, at an event last
>>> evening stated that he expects 6 mos. or more until ARIN run out.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Proposal 124 directly challenges that assertion and I think that it would be
>> a disservice to the entities in the request queue at the time of exhaustion
>> and implementation to leave them hanging in the air of uncertainty.
>> 
>> http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2010-December/018936.html
>> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> -M<
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
>> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
>> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for
>> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not
>> the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any
>> dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the
>> contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be
>> unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender
>> immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail
>> and any printout.
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for
> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the
> contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender
> immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail
> and any printout.