[arin-ppml] Defcon speaker calls IPv6 a 'security nightmare'

[Roger Marquis]

> Getting back to the technical reasons for NAT, or at least trying to, are
> there no takers for these questions?

More unanswered questions for IPv6 nat-o-phobes:

  <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/08/06/ipv6_security_nightmare/>

  "It is extremely important for hackers to get in here fast because IPv6
  is a security nightmare," Sam Bowne, an instructor  in the Computer
  Networking and Information Technology Department at the City College of
  San Francisco, said on day one of the Defcon hacker conference in Las
  Vegas. "We're coming into a time of crisis and no one is ready."

Roger Marquis