[arin-ppml] Set aside round deux
marquis at roble.com
Mon Aug 9 14:09:54 EDT 2010
michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:
>> but the real world stuff, where internal clients have a single IP and a
>> single default route that doesn't change, without localhost
>> accommodations (ie., points of failure) of any kind.
> This is just plain weird. You seem to be using "multihome" to mean something
> other than BGP multihoming.
An understandable confusion perhaps for network engineers with
exclusively backbone experience. For the rest of us, with outside
networks smaller than /23, multihoming is done via NAT rather than BGP.
Small businesses do not want to add an exterior routing protocols to
every internal device. They simply want to order a second hicap or DSL
line, often with a dynamic external IP, and let NAT take care of the
rest. We're not talking about Internet servers here, just residences and
small businesses, the vast majority of end-nodes, connecting to the
Internet. This population doesn't need to disrup persistent internal
connections for unrelated external events and it won't deprecate simple
and reliable NAT(/HSRP) solutions to accomodate IPv6's ill thought-out
"GUA everywhere" proponents.
More information about the ARIN-PPML