[arin-ppml] IPv6 /32 minimum for extra-small ISP

William Herrin bill at herrin.us
Mon Apr 26 10:04:44 EDT 2010

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Gary Giesen <ggiesen at akn.ca> wrote:
> On 10-04-26 2:13 AM, "William Herrin" <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>> It's a line item in the overhead budget. The budget requested is
>> larger than the budget approved.
> An IPv6 /32 also doesn't cost anything if you have a /20 or larger v4
> allocation. If you have an X-Small (smaller than /20), it's only an extra
> $1250/year. Pretty small potatoes. By the time you *need* IPv6, it will just
> be the cost of doing business, and will be pretty easy to justify it (pretty
> hard to be an ISP without it).

By the time I need IPv6, you need me to have finished my IPv6
deployment ages ago so that you can stop paying the premium for IPv4.

Bill Herrin

William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list