[arin-ppml] ARIN Policy Clarification: Micro-Allocations
aaron at wholesaleinternet.net
Wed Apr 14 14:00:20 EDT 2010
You can definitely write a policy proposal that changes the language of the
current text to provide for more "openness".
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of John Palmer
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:28 AM
To: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: [arin-ppml] ARIN Policy Clarification: Micro-Allocations
In the "ARIN Number Resource Policy Manual" is the following section on
ARIN will make micro-allocations to critical infrastructure providers of the
Internet, including public exchange points, core DNS
service providers (e.g. ICANN-sanctioned root, gTLD, and ccTLD operators) as
well as the RIRs and IANA. These allocations will be no
longer than a /24 using IPv4 or a /48 using IPv6. Multiple allocations may
be granted in certain situations. - Exchange point
allocations MUST be allocated from specific blocks reserved only for this
purpose. All other micro-allocations WILL be allocated out
of other blocks reserved for micro-allocation purposes. ARIN will make a
list of these blocks publicly available. - Exchange point
operators must provide justification for the allocation, including:
connection policy, location, other participants (minimum of two
total), ASN, and contact information. ISPs and other organizations receiving
these micro-allocations will be charged under the ISP
fee schedule, while end-users will be charged under the fee schedule for
end-users. This policy does not preclude exchange point
operators from requesting address space under other policies."
The part the concerns me is that part that says "e.g. ICANN-sanctioned root,
gTLD and ccTLD operators".
Excuse me, but since when do DNS operators have to be ICANN sanctioned? You
know that there is such a thing called the Inclusive
Namespace. ICANN is not the only authorized root network operator.
ARIN is supposed to support the whole community, not just the DNS services
sanctioned by ICANN.
I would like to propose to the ARIN board that the phrase "(e.g.
ICANN-sanctioned root, gTLD and ccTLD operators)" be replaced with
"(root, gTLD and ccTLD operators)".
My company manages and operates the WorldRoot, an Inclusive Namespace root
network and would like to have 13 micro-allocations for
Anycast operations of our 13 DNS server sets around the world as well as IP6
microallocations in the near future. As it stands, we
will probably be able to populate 3 to 4 complete cloneSets (13 servers
each) in the next 3 to 5 years. The language in Section 4.4
of the NRPM seems to exclude our ability to obtain the neccesary number
resources and is discriminatory to the Inclusive Namespace
and therefore in violation of ARIN's mission to serve the ENTIRE North
ARIN Board - please take note of my request and respond.
John Palmer - President
American Webmasters Inc
(operator of the WorldRoot root server network - http://worldroot.net)
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.801 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2796 - Release Date: 04/13/10
More information about the ARIN-PPML