[arin-ppml] ULA-C and reverse DNS

Gary T. Giesen ggiesen at akn.ca
Tue Apr 6 12:26:39 EDT 2010

Absolutely nothing (maybe a little less paperwork). That's why ULA-C is
pointless and GUA should be assigned.


On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 12:24 -0400, Kevin Kargel wrote:
> > Respectfully suggest you figure out how to make registered ULA work in
> > the $20-$50 range and _then_ think about how to make GUA more like it.
> > GUA costs $1250, based more or less on the costs of running a registry
> > according to the policies we've created for GUA. ULA isn't workable at
> > $1250 a pop and while you guys talk fantasies of shaving two orders of
> > magnitude off GUA's registry cost the ULA need continues to go
> > unserved.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Bill Herrin
> > 
> Hmmm..  what makes ULA cheaper to administer than GUA from an RIR perspective?  One or the other is an artificial economy.
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list