[arin-ppml] ULA-C and reverse DNS

Michael Richardson mcr at sandelman.ca
Tue Apr 6 11:52:16 EDT 2010

Hash: SHA1

>>>>> "William" == William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> writes:
    William> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Kevin Kargel
    William> <kkargel at polartel.com> wrote:
    >>> for the record I'd vote +1 for essentially no ULA-* ... and just
    >>> allowing folks to get GUA for their needs.
    >> I have to agree.  As long as it has a "U" in it then it depletes
    >> the pool the same.  We have a big enough pool, let's just make
    >> GUA easy and cheap and not worry about ULA.  If they have
    >> sufficient GUA then rolling your own ULA is trivial.

    William> Respectfully suggest you figure out how to make registered
    William> ULA work in the $20-$50 range and _then_ think about how to
    William> make GUA more like it.  GUA costs $1250, based more or less
    William> on the costs of running a registry according to the
    William> policies we've created for GUA. ULA isn't workable at $1250
    William> a pop and while you guys talk fantasies of shaving two
    William> orders of magnitude off GUA's registry cost the ULA need
    William> continues to go unserved.


RFC1918 is used in all sorts of places where it shouldn't, not because
getting address space is so hard, but because it requires someone else
to sign off.

- -- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition. 

Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list