[arin-ppml] IPv6 /32 minimum for extra-small ISP

Christopher Morrow christopher.morrow at gmail.com
Mon Apr 26 01:44:33 EDT 2010


On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:40 AM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Christopher Morrow
> <christopher.morrow at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 6:19 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 6:06 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>>>> Only the generality was
>>>> important to Ted's reminder that when providing ARIN allocations to
>>>> ISPs that find $2250/year challenging, "you consume the same amount of
>>
>> Is 2250/year really that much of an expense that a business hangs in
>> the balance?
>
> It's IPv6 and it's the year 2010. The business doesn't hang in the
> balance. Maybe next year. Maybe the year after. Maybe.

meaning that today the cost isn't an issue, but because of business
pressures 2250 could be a problem in the future?  Or, did you mean
that in the future the RIR may decide to charge 10x/20x/100x for the
same allocation?

-Chris



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list