[arin-ppml] ULA-C

[joel jaeggli]

Oddly, I work for mondo-megacorp and I find it interesting that you're speaking for all entities that fit that category collectively.  

From my vantage point ,the security posture associated with a particular prefix, service or network internal to our administrative domain is defined by requirements not by some intrinsic nature of the prefix.

George Bonser <gbonser at seven.com> wrote:

>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: joel jaeggli [mailto:joelja at bogus.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 6:37 PM
>> To: George Bonser; mcr at sandelman.ca
>> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
>> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ULA-C
>> 
>> Mondo-megacorp will trivially have enough gua space to address it's
>> extranet and the cost of aquiring space is negible compared to cost of
>> deploying anything inside mondo-megacorp.
>> 
>> Joel
>> 
>
>Joel, you missed the point.  The do not want their financial backend systems on globally routable address space.
>
>They do not want it to even be POSSIBLE that by some kind of misconfiguration, their systems could be reachable from the Internet.  So they put it in address space that is impossible to be reached across the public Internet.
>
>
>
>
>