[arin-ppml] ULA-C and reverse DNS

[William Herrin]

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Kevin Kargel <kkargel at polartel.com> wrote:
>> for the record I'd vote +1 for essentially no ULA-* ... and just
>> allowing folks to get GUA for their needs.
>
> I have to agree.  As long as it has a "U" in it then it depletes
>the pool the same.  We have a big enough pool, let's just
>make GUA easy and cheap and not worry about ULA.  If
>they have sufficient GUA then rolling your own ULA is trivial.

Respectfully suggest you figure out how to make registered ULA work in
the $20-$50 range and _then_ think about how to make GUA more like it.
GUA costs $1250, based more or less on the costs of running a registry
according to the policies we've created for GUA. ULA isn't workable at
$1250 a pop and while you guys talk fantasies of shaving two orders of
magnitude off GUA's registry cost the ULA need continues to go
unserved.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004