[arin-ppml] Fairness of banning IPv4 allocations to some category of organization

[Scott Leibrand]

michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:
>> The pragmatists seek to identify ways to keep the Internet 
>> functioning and growing while whatever happens with new tech 
>> like IPv6 sorts itself out. 
>>     
>
> The pragmatists are out their running IPv6 today and have
> real IPv6 customers on their networks. Some of them are
> small network operators and some are larger, but the pragmatists
> are out there doing it, not arguing the point on ARIN.

Some of us are pragmatically doing both.  I fully anticipate that I'll 
need to provide my customers with both IPv6 and IPv4 service for a 
number of years.  I suspect a lot of us will need to be prepared with 
dual-stack network connectivity, and some plan for dealing with 
post-exhaustion v4 addressing (even if it's just telling your customers 
to BYOA).

-Scott