[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 102: Reduce and Simplify IPv4 Initial Allocations

[Chris Grundemann]

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 15:46, Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us> wrote:
> Member Services wrote:
>>
>> 4.2.2.5. Replacement initial allocation
>>
>> Any ISP which has received an initial allocation, or previous
>> replacement initial allocation, smaller than /20 who wishes to receive
>> additional address space must request a replacement initial
>> allocation. To receive a replacement initial allocation, an ISP must
>> agree to renumber out of and return the existing allocation in it's
>> entirety within 12 months of receiving a new allocation and provide
>> justification for the new allocation as described in section 4.2.4.
>>
>
> OPPOSE. A small org might expect to grow and can be punished multiple
> times (until they get a /20) by forced renumbering. An end-site office
> building, sure, force them to renumber, but not an ISP who is assigning
> address blocks to downstream orgs and customers.

So, just to be clear Seth; you would rather that small ISP not be able
to get resources from ARIN at all then for them to be eligible but
have to renumber?
~Chris

>
> ~Seth
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>




-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.coisoc.org