[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Open Access To IPv6

Stephen Sprunk stephen at sprunk.org
Sun May 31 21:06:04 EDT 2009


bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 02:42:44PM -0700, Garry Dolley wrote:
>   
>> On May 30, 2009, at 2:30 PM, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
>>     
>>> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 02:22:53PM -0700, Garry Dolley wrote:
>>>       
>>>> If uniqueness, and not connectivity, is the concern, look into ULAs
>>>> [1].
>>>> You can use them now, without ever contacting ARIN, or any IRR.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1. RFC 4193, "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses"
>>>>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4193
>>>>         
>>>   sorry - ULA does not assure uniqueness. only that
>>>   statistical probability.
>>>       
>> Correct, but given the use cases mentioned, statistically probable  
>> uniqueness is sufficient.
>>     
>
> 	Not for me.  
>   

If RFC 4193 does not provide sufficient uniqueness for your needs, you
should be able to get a /48 from ARIN under NRPM 6.5.8, passed several
years ago.  There is no requirement for connectedness per NRPM 4.3.5.

If the org doesn't qualify for a /48 per NRPM 4.3.2 (as required by
6.5.8.1.2), I have a serious problem with letting them call themselves
an ISP/LIR and getting 65,536 times the address space.

S

-- 
Stephen Sprunk         "God does not play dice."  --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723         "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS        dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3241 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090531/072e7056/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list