[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Open Access To IPv6
stephen at sprunk.org
Sun May 31 21:06:04 EDT 2009
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 02:42:44PM -0700, Garry Dolley wrote:
>> On May 30, 2009, at 2:30 PM, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 02:22:53PM -0700, Garry Dolley wrote:
>>>> If uniqueness, and not connectivity, is the concern, look into ULAs
>>>> You can use them now, without ever contacting ARIN, or any IRR.
>>>> 1. RFC 4193, "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses"
>>> sorry - ULA does not assure uniqueness. only that
>>> statistical probability.
>> Correct, but given the use cases mentioned, statistically probable
>> uniqueness is sufficient.
> Not for me.
If RFC 4193 does not provide sufficient uniqueness for your needs, you
should be able to get a /48 from ARIN under NRPM 6.5.8, passed several
years ago. There is no requirement for connectedness per NRPM 4.3.5.
If the org doesn't qualify for a /48 per NRPM 4.3.2 (as required by
188.8.131.52.2), I have a serious problem with letting them call themselves
an ISP/LIR and getting 65,536 times the address space.
Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3241 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the ARIN-PPML