[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Open Access To IPv6

Garry Dolley gdolley at arpnetworks.com
Sat May 30 15:06:23 EDT 2009

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:49:02AM -0700, Stacy Hughes wrote:
>  A multihoming requirement discriminates against networks that either cannot
> or do not want to multihome.I oppose this modification.
> Stacy

If you aren't multi-homed, you should get an allocation from your
upstream, IMO.  The block provided by the upstream will be
aggregated, most likely, to *their* upstream / peers, so an extra
routing table slot would not be needed, thereby saving resources.

Garry Dolley
ARP Networks, Inc. | http://www.arpnetworks.com | (818) 206-0181
Data center, VPS, and IP Transit solutions
Member Los Angeles County REACT, Unit 336 | WQGK336
Blog http://scie.nti.st

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list