[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Open Access To IPv6

Chuck Anderson cra at WPI.EDU
Sat May 30 14:53:39 EDT 2009

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 02:36:36PM -0400, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> I support the principle of this proposal, but am somewhat taken 
> aback by the idea that /32s would be the basic unit for smaller, 
> innovative v6 entities. Aren't /48s, which still constitute a huge 
> number of addresses, enough? Or am I missing something here?

The problem is /48s are the basic unit of each site.  So said 
smaller innovative IPv6 entities would need to assign /48s out of 
something larger.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list