[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Open Access To IPv6
owen at delong.com
Fri May 29 15:18:37 EDT 2009
On May 29, 2009, at 9:45 AM, David Farmer wrote:
> On 29 May 2009 Joe Provo wrote:
>> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 08:58:49AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>>> Member Services wrote:
>>>> 1) Remove ???by advertising that connectivity through its single
>>>> aggregated address allocation??? from article 3 of section 126.96.36.199
>>> What's the rationale for this proposed change?
>> It better reflects the reality of the meshy global Internet where
>> aggregated trunk, backbone-only providers are a rare and dying breed.
> Additionally, I believe it may remove the need for for proposal
> 84. IPv6 Multiple Discrete Networks. What to those that
> support that proposal think?
I don't think it will. I can see several scenarios where you would
want your HD ration calculated independently for independent
sites vs. a conjoint determination.
More information about the ARIN-PPML