[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Open Access To IPv6

Chris Malayter cmalayter at switchanddata.com
Fri May 29 12:27:57 EDT 2009


I support this proposal.

-Chris



On 5/29/09 11:25 AM, "Stacy Hughes" <ipgoddess.arin at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Everyone,
> Before we really get started on this policy proposal, I must give credit where
> credit is due.
> Jordi Palet Martinez brought this topic to the table 3 years ago, and it got
> shot down.  I myself, in my small IPv4-centric mind, thought it impossible
> that an IPv6 only organization could exist.  Operations and innovation have
> shown me the error of our thinking.
> To quote myself from a different list:
> IPv6 is a new paradigm we are supposed to be doing our best to encourage.  As
> it stands, those community guys can't get it, the Caribbean guys can't get it,
> and basically anyone trying to do anything vanguard can't get it either.  (I
> hear the ULA objections here, even when they're nascent). 
> 
> We can be afraid of what IPv6 might do to the routing table, or we can embrace
> what IPv6 can and will do for the Internet.
> I choose the latter and support this proposal.
> Stacy 
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Member Services <info at arin.net> wrote:
>> ARIN received the following policy proposal and is posting it to the
>> Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) in accordance with Policy Development
>> Process.
>> 
>> This proposal is in the first stage of the Policy Development Process.
>> ARIN staff will perform the Clarity and Understanding step. Staff does
>> not evaluate the proposal at this time, their goal is to make sure that
>> they understand the proposal and believe the community will as well.
>> Staff will report their results to the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) within
>> 10 days.
>> 
>> The AC will review the proposal at their next regularly scheduled
>> meeting (if the period before the next regularly scheduled meeting is
>> less than 10 days, then the period may be extended to the subsequent
>> regularly scheduled meeting). The AC will decide how to utilize the
>> proposal and announce the decision to the PPML.
>> 
>> In the meantime, the AC invites everyone to comment on the proposal on
>> the PPML, particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning
>> behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough
>> vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations.
>> 
>> The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
>> 
>> Mailing list subscription information can be found
>> at:https://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Member Services
>> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>> 
>> 
>> ## * ##
>> 
>> 
>> Policy Proposal Name: Open Access To IPv6
>> 
>> Proposal Originator: Stacy Hughes and Cathy Aronson
>> 
>> Proposal Version: 1.0
>> 
>> Date: 29 May 2009
>> 
>> Proposal type: modify
>> 
>> Policy term: permanent
>> 
>> Policy statement:
>> 
>> 1) Remove ³by advertising that connectivity through its single
>> aggregated address allocation² from article 3 of section 6.5.1.1
>> 
>> 2) Remove article 4 of section 6.5.1.1, ³be an existing, known ISP in
>> the ARIN region or have a plan for making at least 200 end-site
>> assignments to other organizations within 5 years² in its entirety.
>> 
>> Rationale: It is acknowledged that these concepts have been put before
>> the community in the past. However, with the wisdom of actual
>> operational experience, the necessity of promoting IPv6 adoption
>> throughout our region, and emerging native v6 only network models, it
>> becomes obvious that these modifications to the NRPM are necessary.
>> Removing the 200 end site requirement enables smaller, but no less
>> important and viable, networks access to IPv6. Removing the Œknown ISP¹
>> requirement enfranchises new, native v6 businesses that can drive
>> innovation and expansion in the Internet industry, as well as other
>> industries. Removing the requirement for a single aggregate announcement
>> benefits the NRPM itself, as it has been decided by the community that
>> it should not contain routing advice.
>> 
>> Timetable for implementation: immediately upon BoT ratification
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090529/a5213cec/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list