[arin-ppml] 2009-1 comment

John Curran jcurran at istaff.org
Thu May 28 12:01:07 EDT 2009

On May 28, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> After re-reviewing 2009-1 and 2008-6, it's pretty clear that there's  
> nothing wrong with 2008-6 and that 2009-1 was far more controversial  
> and non-consensual. 2008-6 opens the door for the kind of transfers  
> that adhere to the traditional "need" criteria while giving those  
> with unneeded resources an incentive to release them. that's all  
> that needs to be done at this point. RIPE has already done it, and  
> the sky hasn't fallen. I support moving on with it, and would oppose  
> any effort to reopen the issue until and unless the passed policy  
> has actually been implemented long enough to assess its results.

Milton -

   Could you express those aspects of 2009-1 that you object to?


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list