[arin-ppml] 2009-1 comment
jcurran at istaff.org
Thu May 28 12:01:07 EDT 2009
On May 28, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> After re-reviewing 2009-1 and 2008-6, it's pretty clear that there's
> nothing wrong with 2008-6 and that 2009-1 was far more controversial
> and non-consensual. 2008-6 opens the door for the kind of transfers
> that adhere to the traditional "need" criteria while giving those
> with unneeded resources an incentive to release them. that's all
> that needs to be done at this point. RIPE has already done it, and
> the sky hasn't fallen. I support moving on with it, and would oppose
> any effort to reopen the issue until and unless the passed policy
> has actually been implemented long enough to assess its results.
Could you express those aspects of 2009-1 that you object to?
More information about the ARIN-PPML