[arin-ppml] Snork... Yawn... S'up?
BillD at cait.wustl.edu
Fri May 22 11:45:56 EDT 2009
The 'proposal' was intended to be implemented immediately under the
emergency powers of the Board...rather than as in 2008-6 where the
implementation indicated a future, un-specified date.
I was merely pointing out the essential differences from 2008-6 and the
'proposed' 2009-1 for Bill's edification.
You were along for the ride during all the earlier discussion and
subsequents meetings, etc. So, I'm surprised that you are still confused
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net
> [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of michael.dillon at bt.com
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 9:09 AM
> To: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Snork... Yawn... S'up?
> > In short, the board proposed the 2009-1 proposal with Woody's words
> > which dismissed the sunset clause, incorporated more than IPv4 into
> > the bargain and implemented immediately, etc.
> Implemented immediately...
> So, have any IP blocks been transferred yet? When will we
> hear some stats on how many blocks and how big they are?
> --Michael Dillon
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML