[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Open Access To IPv6

[Owen DeLong]

>
>> 2) Remove article 4 of section 6.5.1.1, “be an existing, known ISP in
>> the ARIN region or have a plan for making at least 200 end-site
>> assignments to other organizations within 5 years” in its entirety.
>> Rationale: It is acknowledged that these concepts have been put  
>> before
>> the community in the past. However, with the wisdom of actual
>> operational experience, the necessity of promoting IPv6 adoption
>> throughout our region, and emerging native v6 only network models, it
>> becomes obvious that these modifications to the NRPM are necessary.
>> Removing the 200 end site requirement enables smaller, but no less
>> important and viable, networks access to IPv6. Removing the ‘known  
>> ISP’
>> requirement enfranchises new, native v6 businesses that can drive
>> innovation and expansion in the Internet industry, as well as other
>> industries. Removing the requirement for a single aggregate  
>> announcement
>> benefits the NRPM itself, as it has been decided by the community  
>> that
>> it should not contain routing advice.
>
> I OPPOSE this change because "smaller, but no less important and  
> viable, networks" can already apply for and obtain a /48 under  
> existing policies.
>
Not as ISPs assigning /48s to end users, they cannot.

Owen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090530/1b7f4338/attachment.p7s>