[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Open Access To IPv6

[bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:06:23PM -0700, Garry Dolley wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:49:02AM -0700, Stacy Hughes wrote:
> >  A multihoming requirement discriminates against networks that either cannot
> > or do not want to multihome.I oppose this modification.
> > Stacy
> 
> If you aren't multi-homed, you should get an allocation from your
> upstream, IMO.  The block provided by the upstream will be
> aggregated, most likely, to *their* upstream / peers, so an extra
> routing table slot would not be needed, thereby saving resources.
> 
> -- 
> Garry Dolley
> ARP Networks, Inc. | http://www.arpnetworks.com | (818) 206-0181

	what upstream is that?  once again, the limiting notion that
	there connectedness to "someone else" is a prerequiste for using IP.
	uniqueness i can understand (someday you might want to be connected,
	but now...)

--bill