[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Open Access To IPv6
Matthew Kaufman
matthew at matthew.at
Sat May 30 00:00:38 EDT 2009
James Hess wrote:
>> If your argument is routing table size, that's a separate problem that isn't
>> ARIN's problem.
>>
>> Back in the (actually not so) early IPv4 days, I got an IPv4 /24 for my
>> house. My friends and I learned a whole lot about setting up IP networks
>> using our real-world address. Didn't cost us a cent, and many of us have
>> gone on to do more interesting things in the Internet world.
>>
> [snip]
>
> And it was that liberal allocation of /24s partly to blame for why
> IPv4 exhaustion is coming sooner than otherwise....
>
You're right, but not for the reason you think.
That liberal allocation meant that a whole lot of people who were
playing with IP decided to try to hook up to the global Internet, and
the commercial Internet happened. Without them, it might still be a
research-and-education playground.
> There simply aren't enough /32s in existence for _everyone_
> to get one to play with.
>
See my earlier comments about reasonably-sized allocations for anyone
who asks... I didn't suggest that *everyone* would need or get a /32.
Matthew Kaufman
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list