[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2009-1: Transfer Policy (Using the Emergency PDP)
woody at pch.net
Thu Mar 26 19:50:04 EDT 2009
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, David Farmer wrote:
> 2. Other comments about the removal of the 3 year sunset clause...
Every single sentence in the NRPM could have a sunset clause, doubling the
size of the document and requiring that every part of it be constantly
maintained. Since the public _already has_ the capability to roll back
any part of the NRPM at any time, or to override any previously-enacted
sunset clause at any time, sunset clauses are no-ops.
> 1. 2008-6 included the following language, "Number resources may only be
> received under RSA", and I don't see that anywhere in the 2009-1 language.
8.1, paragraph 2, among others.
ARIN does not give resources to organizations that do not sign an RSA.
That doesn't need to be restated in every paragraph.
> If you assume that all resources assigned through the NPRM are covered by
> the RSA then I might agree this is not a "material change."
> 2. Within 2008-6 the title of section 8.4 was "Emergency Transfer Policy for
> IPv4 Addresses". 2009-1 doesn't include any language to limit this
> to IPv4 resources only.
Is there a perceived problem there? Is there a perceived need to
transfer IPv6 addresses or ASNs? If so, is that more problematic than
> If the Board intended this to include IPv6 and ANS resources,
> then why keep the Mergers and Acquisitions section?
That was indeed the subject of no little discussion, as I imagine
you'll find when you read the meeting minutes.
More information about the ARIN-PPML