[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2008-7: Identify Invalid WHOIS POC's

Rodgers Moore rmoore at fnsky.com
Thu Mar 26 11:02:55 EDT 2009

I'm a newbie here, so I've missed a lot of discussion.  This has
probably already been covered.

We have a built in keep alive in the system.  The renewal fee.  Change
it from annual to quarterly for IPv4.  Or are the new policies to weed
out stale delegations?

Rodgers Moore, CCIE# 8153

-----Original Message-----
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of Lee Dilkie
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:18 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2008-7: Identify Invalid WHOIS

Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> And, once we know the amount of stale assignments in WHOIS, it is then
> possible to judge the viability of all of the various "IPv4
> schemes and see if it's worth spending money on them.
> Why have ARIN spend a huge amount of time and effort and money trying
> to reclaim IPv4 if it turns out that after we groom WHOIS that only
> a small fraction of IPv4 allocations are bogus?  Conversely, if we
> that, say 50% of assigned IPv4 is abandonded or unverifable, then
> we know that Ipv4 runout will be many years away.
> Ted
got it. Makes good sense.
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Rodgers Moore.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 465 bytes
Desc: Rodgers Moore.vcf
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090326/7f337358/attachment-0001.vcf>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list