[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2008-7: Identify Invalid WHOIS POC's
tedm at ipinc.net
Tue Mar 24 16:23:25 EDT 2009
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Sprunk [mailto:stephen at sprunk.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 1:19 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: 'Lee Dilkie'; ARIN PPML
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2008-7: Identify
> Invalid WHOIS POC's
> Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net
> >> [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Lee Dilkie
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 4:52 AM
> >> To: Owen DeLong
> >> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
> >> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2008-7: Identify
> Invalid WHOIS
> >> POC's
> >> ...
> >> Since the policy specified "email" and that is only one of many
> >> contact methods, perhaps the policy shouldn't be so
> specific either
> >> and simply leave the details of "contacting the record holder" to
> >> staff.
> > ...
> > Don't you think it's a bit odd that your proposing ON AN
> E-MAIL MAILING LIST that we countenence removal of the
> requirement for valid E-MAIL addresses in POC entries? Using
> your own, publically reachable, personal e-mail address to do
> so? You obviously have no problem with making your own
> e-mail address public - so why would you think that any
> reasons put forth by a POC for not having a valid e-mail
> address published in WHOIS are anything other than bogus nonsense?
> IMHO, that is a gross misrepresentation of what Lee said. I
> agree, as I believe Lee does, that all POC records should
> have valid email addresses.
OK then, would you be willing to support a policy proposal that
ONLY stated all POC's must have valid e-mail addresses? Nothing else
about validation or any of that? Just a simple statement that
all POCs in the whois database must have valid e-mail addresses?
More information about the ARIN-PPML