[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2009-2: Depleted IPv4 reserves
stephen at sprunk.org
Tue Mar 24 15:09:04 EDT 2009
Matthew Wilder wrote:
> I don't protest for the sake of demanding unfair privileges on the behalf of large ISPs. I protest a policy that says everyone can have their needs completely met except for one group, which can't even have a reasonable fraction of their need met.
By the time this proposal would become active, there would not be enough
IP addresses left for the mega-ISPs to all have a "reasonable fraction
of their need met" anyways, given the rate of consumption and allocation
window. The difference in a few percentage points (getting 10% of their
request instead of 15%) for those mega-ISPs, though, would be the
difference between the thousands of other members getting most of what
they need for a year or two and getting absolutely nothing (because the
mega-ISPs had grabbed up the entire remaining free pool in one request).
There is simply no way to be "fair" when 1% of members account for 80%+
of the IPv4 burn rate; someone's going to get screwed when we hit the
wall, and the options are screwing only the biggest 1% or screwing
everyone (including that 1%). You might not see a difference from where
you sit, but the other 99% of us do.
Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3241 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the ARIN-PPML