[arin-ppml] A modest proposal for IPv6 address allocations

McTim dogwallah at gmail.com
Thu Jun 4 16:55:08 EDT 2009

On 6/4/09, Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at> wrote:
> >
> >
>  This statement is not only accurate, but it applies equally well to the
> unreasonably high price of IPv6 space allocations.

What's unreasonable about free (If you have v4 resources), or 75%
discount if you don't have any v4 (this year).

My reading of https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html is that a
/32 will set you back a whopping $562.50.  Perhaps I've missed


"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list