[arin-ppml] [arin-announce] Policy Proposal: Transfer listingservice

[Kevin Kargel]

> >
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > Out of curiosity, do you think that litigators and regulators are
> > more likely (or maybe very likely) to keep their fingers out if,
> > after enabling the emergence of commercial IPv4 transfers, the RIRs
> > take no further actions of any kind related to any IPv4 markets that
> > emerge thereafter? Are your views on that probability-of-
> > intervention question based on any particular expectation about
> > whether and how IPv4 markets will actually work, or are they
> > independent of all such expectations (i.e., no matter how things
> > turn out, it would be better in all cases for the RIRs to take no
> > position / no action at all)?
> >
> IANAL, but, I think they are far less likely to name ARIN as defendants.
> 
> Owen

I am not worried so much about ARIN becoming a defendant as I am about how
it will affect the normal course of business.  However, as has been stated,
the barn doors are open and the cows are out, it just remains to see where
they go.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3224 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090615/12ca755c/attachment.bin>