[arin-ppml] A modest proposal for IPv6 address allocations
dogwallah at gmail.com
Thu Jun 4 16:55:08 EDT 2009
On 6/4/09, Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at> wrote:
> This statement is not only accurate, but it applies equally well to the
> unreasonably high price of IPv6 space allocations.
What's unreasonable about free (If you have v4 resources), or 75%
discount if you don't have any v4 (this year).
My reading of https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html is that a
/32 will set you back a whopping $562.50. Perhaps I've missed
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
More information about the ARIN-PPML