[arin-ppml] Rationale for /22

[bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:15:14PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 06:01:33PM +0000, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> > > While it is a bit of a reductio ad absurdum argument, consider what
> > > (could) happen if the minimum were a /32.
> > 
> > 
> > 	kind of like what happens when we give out everyone a /32
> > 	of IPv6 space.  your arguments are identical for either 
> > 	an IPv4 or IPv6 /32.  
> > 
> > 	and yet we find it acceptable to hand out /32's in one space...
> 
> Bzzt.  Thanks for playing.  Please pick up a lovely parting gift on your
> way out the door.

	not at all young man... there are exacatly the same number
	of /32s in IPv4 and IPv6.  but since you know best, i'll 
	sit back and watch the fireworks.


> FUD, total FUD.

	and a FIB entry is a FIB entry.  otherwise, I couldn't 
	agree with you more.

> -- 
>        Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440

--bill