[arin-ppml] FW: Rationale for /22
kkargel at polartel.com
Wed Jul 29 14:21:54 EDT 2009
> I think it's more about what I see of your customer's routes. If you
> announce a /20 and your customer via another provider announces a /23 I
> will always prefer that path. So, my bits (and your revenue) will go to
> the other provider.
Which is absolutely fine by me if that's the way they want to balance their
traffic. My revenue is the same whether his circuit is 1% or 99% utilized.
I don't understand why you would have a problem with it?
If any of my upstream providers dictated that my traffic had to go through
them things would get exciting real quick, or I would have a different
provider. This would be especially true in the case of a burstable circuit.
I have never had an upstream provider complain because my circuit was
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3224 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ARIN-PPML