[arin-ppml] Rationale for /22

[bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:30:33AM +0200, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> 
> 
> Kevin Kargel wrote:
> >>   Obviously the primary reason for a limit is the accepted minimum routing
> >> entry size of a /24.  Of course, you knew that.  So why ask the question?
> > 
> > Perhaps it is time to examine the 'accepted minimum routing entry size'.  If
> > it won't cause problems then why not extend the mask size?  Or are you
> > saying that long mask route entries do in fact cause problems?
> 
> I'm happy to compress longer entreis out of my fib. If there's a route
> for a covering prefix that's shorter, as there generally is for
> multihomer using there upstream's address space then, no problem some
> level of connectivity is preserved, possibly not as much as the
> multihomer desires but enough for my purposes.


	so, you would be happy with Peter Lothbergs old sprint announcement
	of 128.0.0.0/3  ??

--bill