[arin-ppml] IPv4 Run Out Proposals

[michael.dillon at bt.com]

> 93. Predicable IPv4 Run Out by Prefix Size 
> http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2009-June/014635.html
> 
> 94. Predictable IPv4 Run Out by Allocation Window 
> http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2009-June/014392.html

> 1. Should they be merged together and move forward as a 
> single Draft Policy?

Yes. Hash out the merged wording on this list and go with whatever
seems to be better supported.

> 5. Should they both be abandoned? 

No, because that would only cause a bunch of new similar proposals.

> In order to make it on to the agenda for Dearborn, Draft 
> Policy text must be ready for Staff and Legal Review by the 
> end of this week.  

It wouldn't hurt to miss that deadline, but do some work at 
Dearborn on a merger of the two ideas.

--Michael Dillon